private teacher classes will be taken only for physics and chemistry
With over 15 years of dedicated teaching experience, I am an accomplished and qualified educator specializing in Spoken English, Math, Science, Social...
Do you need help in finding the best teacher matching your requirements?
Post your requirement nowI am a teacher of mathematics. I am giving online tuitions and tuitions at my home in Jaipur(Rajasthan). I have done M.Sc. , B.Ed. in mathematics....
I have been teaching class 10 students for the past 8 years. I teach students by making fundamentals clear. I prepare them for their board exam by...
Hello dear students, I am PRANJAL MISHRA, I teach Mathematics (upto A level) . I can improve your understanding in Mathematics using my innovative...
I am an experienced tutor with over 5 years of experience in teaching English, Tamil, Maths, Science, Social Science, History, Political Science across...
This is Debabrato Chatterjee online Maths and Science tutor having 13+years of experience. I have already and presently teaching students of IB,...
Great
I am R.Vinotha ., M.Sc., M.Phil., B.Ed in mathematics.I am the trainer/tutor of this course .I was allotted 12 regular classes for a month.I am using...
Sushma attended Class 10 Tuition
"He teaches well and explains till the concept is understood well"
Mary attended Class 10 Tuition
"not started yet"
Susan attended Class 10 Tuition
"Constructive teaching"
Ananya attended Class 10 Tuition
"Very efficient, friendly & caring."
Anna attended Class 10 Tuition
"He is prompt. He knows the subject and teaches well."
Swaraj attended Class 10 Tuition
"Satnam Sir is a very good teacher, he single handedly taught me my whole of Java..."
Binit attended Class 10 Tuition
"narayan sir has guided me very well in the whole academic year. He is very dedicated..."
Anurag attended Class 10 Tuition
"I was introduced to Narayan Sir by one of my classmates who has been taking tuition..."
Ask a Question
Post a LessonAnswered on 17 Apr Learn CBSE/Class 10/Mathematics/UNIT I: Number systems/Real numbers/Euclid's Division Lemma
Nazia Khanum
To find the Highest Common Factor (HCF) of 52 and 117 and express it in the form 52x + 117y, we can use the Euclidean algorithm.
Step 1: Find the Remainder
Divide the larger number by the smaller number and find the remainder.
117=2×52+13117=2×52+13
So, the remainder is 13.
Step 2: Replace Numbers
Now, replace the divisor with the previous remainder, and the dividend with the divisor.
52=4×13+052=4×13+0
Here, the remainder is 0, so we stop. The divisor at this step, which is 13, is the HCF.
Expressing in the given form
Now, we backtrack to express the HCF, which is 13, in the form 52x + 117y.
Using the reverse steps of the Euclidean algorithm, we can express the HCF as a linear combination of 52 and 117:
13=117−2×5213=117−2×52
Hence, the HCF of 52 and 117 expressed in the form 52x + 117y is 13=117−2×5213=117−2×52.
Answered on 17 Apr Learn CBSE/Class 10/Mathematics/UNIT I: Number systems/Real numbers/Euclid's Division Lemma
Nazia Khanum
To prove that x2−xx2−x is divisible by 2 for all positive integer xx, we can use mathematical induction.
Base Case: Let's start by checking the base case. When x=1x=1, x2−x=12−1=0x2−x=12−1=0. Since 0 is divisible by 2, the base case holds.
Inductive Hypothesis: Assume that x2−xx2−x is divisible by 2 for some positive integer kk, i.e., k2−kk2−k is divisible by 2.
Inductive Step: We need to show that if the statement holds for kk, then it also holds for k+1k+1.
(k+1)2−(k+1)=k2+2k+1−k−1=k2+k=(k2−k)+k(k+1)2−(k+1)=k2+2k+1−k−1=k2+k=(k2−k)+k
By the inductive hypothesis, we know that k2−kk2−k is divisible by 2. And we know that kk is a positive integer, so kk is also divisible by 2 or it is an odd number.
If kk is divisible by 2, then k2−kk2−k is divisible by 2, and kk is divisible by 2, so their sum (k2−k)+k(k2−k)+k is also divisible by 2.
If kk is an odd number, then k2−kk2−k is still divisible by 2, and when you add kk to it, you still get an even number, which is divisible by 2.
In both cases, (k+1)2−(k+1)(k+1)2−(k+1) is divisible by 2.
Therefore, by mathematical induction, we conclude that x2−xx2−x is divisible by 2 for all positive integers xx.
Answered on 26/11/2022 Learn CBSE/Class 10/Mathematics/UNIT I: Number systems/Real numbers/Euclid's Division Lemma
Sandhya
Maths tutor with 7 years experience
Answered on 17 Apr Learn CBSE/Class 10/Mathematics/UNIT I: Number systems/Real numbers/Rational and irrational numbers
Nazia Khanum
Sure, let's prove this by induction.
Base Case:
When n=2n=2, a2=a×aa2=a×a, where aa is a positive rational number. The product of two rational numbers is rational, so a2a2 is rational.
Inductive Step:
Assume that anan is rational for some positive integer n>1n>1.
Consider an+1an+1: an+1=an×aan+1=an×a
By the inductive hypothesis, anan is rational. And since aa is rational (given in the problem), the product of two rational numbers is rational. Therefore, an+1an+1 is rational.
By mathematical induction, anan is rational for all positive integers n>1n>1.
Answered on 17 Apr Learn CBSE/Class 10/Mathematics/UNIT I: Number systems/Real numbers/Rational and irrational numbers
Nazia Khanum
To prove that 3636 and 3333
are irrational numbers, we can use a proof by contradiction.
Let's assume that 3636
is rational. This means it can be expressed as a fraction in simplest form, where both the numerator and denominator are integers and the denominator is not zero.
So, let's assume 36=ab36
=ba, where aa and bb are integers with no common factors other than 1, and b≠0b=0.
Now, let's square both sides of the equation to eliminate the square root:
Now, multiply both sides by b2b2 to clear the fraction:
So, a2a2 must be divisible by 54. This implies aa must be divisible by 5454
.
However, 54=2×3354=2×33. Since there's a 3333 term, for a2a2 to be divisible by 3333, aa must also be divisible by 33.
Now, let's consider the original equation again:
If aa is divisible by 33, then abba is also divisible by 33, but then 3636
is not in simplest form, which contradicts our assumption. Therefore, 3636
cannot be rational.
Similarly, we can show that 3333
is also irrational by following a similar proof by contradiction. Therefore, both 3636 and 3333
are irrational numbers.
Ask a Question